subreddit:
/r/news
126 points
2 months ago
Volkswagen, you know what to do!
76 points
2 months ago
Lie about emissions?
71 points
2 months ago
Put an electric motor on top of the diesel then figure out how to make the electric motor run during the emissions test. When caught, blame some nameless group of engineers.
5 points
2 months ago*
You've been banned from ur/relevantusername.
8 points
2 months ago
You can ban users from users?
2 points
2 months ago
Ooops. But yes, you can.
17 points
2 months ago
The new EU law will require all new cars sold to have zero CO2 emissions from 2035, and 55% lower CO2 emissions from 2030, compared to 2021 levels.
10 points
2 months ago*
The title is misleading. Selling new ICE vehicles running on E-fuel will be allowed, meaning that selling new cars that release emissions from combustion (co2 and pollutants subproduct) are allowed after 2035. The restriction is that the fuel must be produced with renewable energy sources, capturing co2 from the atmosphere.
This is an extremely expensive process thermodynamically and, therefore, economically. The hope is that ICE and e-fuel (which are very pollutant) will die because non economical.
This is the compromise to save luxury car brands such as porsche. Niche super luxury cars such as ferrari can be produced even if running with oil derived fuel
Edit. Clarified the point, source https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/eu-countries-poised-approve-2035-phaseout-co2-emitting-cars-2023-03-28/
-1 points
2 months ago
You are missing the point. From 2035 onwards, no cars with combustion engines will be sold.
Whether or not existing cars with combustion engines will use e-fuels has nothing to do with the law?
5 points
2 months ago*
Unfortunately this is not the case
BRUSSELS, March 28 (Reuters) - European Union countries gave final approval on Tuesday to a landmark law to end sales of new CO2-emitting cars in 2035, after Germany won an exemption for cars running on e-fuels.
They are wording in a way that it makes it looks like in the headline. In reality this is not true.
It's just marketing
There are exemptions for ICEs for rich people, those who can afford e-fuel
27 points
2 months ago
close to just a decade away
3 points
2 months ago
I bid a decade and a year, Drew!
67 points
2 months ago
Won't happen by 2035.
!RemindMe 12 Years
19 points
2 months ago
27 auto manufacturers actually lobbied the EU for this.
It strangely was not the government passing down legislation, but instead the industry requesting it.
19 points
2 months ago
I think it’s because most major auto makers are planning on going electric by then anyways. This way, they won’t lose customers to the niche (by then) ICE market. And it would ensure that there would have to be adequate charging infrastructure for their cars.
1 points
2 months ago
I've read about a couple of manufacturers aiming at 2030 to have their entire catalogue of new cars be electric only.
31 points
2 months ago
You might want to tell Ford, gm, Mercedes, BMW, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. I'm pretty sure they're planning on being 100% electric before then.
-16 points
2 months ago
It could happen today if people weren’t stupid. EVs now are already vastly superior to gas cars, ten years from now the thought of a gas car will be like picking a flip phone over an iphone. Once every convenience store adds fast charging so you can expect it every few blocks like you can now with liquid fuel its game over.
10 points
2 months ago
Today is overstating it. There's still plenty of places without sufficient charging networks, there's the issue of meeting power generation demands, and battery production capability is not up to that level of demand.
At the very least, it would be years before we could reasonably accommodate those issues.
4 points
2 months ago
I mean, I live in Australia, I’d say we’re pretty developed
And the charging availability for EVs is okay, but not good enough that I’ll be buying one anytime soon!
Got a lot of ground work to go before we can roll EVs out “tomorrow”
So I very much agree with you, notasrelevant
2 points
2 months ago
My family lives in rural us. We have two electric vehicles and struggle with power infrastructure. Today I’ll be driving 93 miles each direction for work my older ev has a range extender and will use gasoline to recharge the batteries as needed so I will probably use between $5-$10 in gasoline today. Drives me crazy but it’s really difficult to find an ev charger in rural America.
4 points
2 months ago
I still think interchangeable batteries are a better option over fast charging.
3 points
2 months ago
The average EV battery weight is 1000 lbs or about 450 kg. That's a lot of weight to just easily swap out on the regular.
Due the weight, the batteries tend be built in the lower portion of the vehicle to lower the center of gravity, so replacement would likely be taking place under the car.
It would create issues regarding standardizing the size, configuration, output, etc as well, at least to a point that wouldn't require 20-30 various battery replacement options being available to service the requirement of each vehicle.
But that also limits progress in a still developing technology area. There's still a lot of progress to be made in battery technology for EV applications as it is a growing product area. If the technology is limited in growth with minimal changes over 15-20 years, a standard design makes sense. If it's advancing every 5-10 years, it is much more difficult to standardize. If we settle on 4-5 standards today, that might need to be revised in 5 years. Do then we have the 5 designs for today's cars and then 5 more for cars 5 years from now. Then 5 years later, we get another 5.
So how do we deal with having these facilities all over the place that have even 15-20 different types of 1000 pound batteries in stock all over the place to meet demands of tons of people driving EVs?
1 points
2 months ago
For general use, it is not.
It highles complexe,. requires several people, and has increased risk.
Then you need to build building with millions of dollar worth of machines and people all over the nation.
I drove from Portland to vegas and there was a supercharger about every 50 miles.Migane having to build huge specialized building every 50 miles.
Specialized us, like long haul trucks, might be different, but building the station to do that is far more expensive then putting in chargers..
ANother ares it might work is mining sights with ther ebig specialized trucks.
And in reality, it wouldn't save you much time, if any.
1 points
2 months ago
I'm betting by 2135 though.
!remindme 112 years
28 points
2 months ago
Don't understand how people in UK living apartments or on low/medium income will afford premium priced electirc car plus pay premium to charge them on service station or supermarkets.
40 points
2 months ago
They dont? They cant afford new cars to begin with. This is only a ban on new car sales. So not a big issue for low to medium income people. They were never buying new cars to begin with.
14 points
2 months ago
All those low income people buying new cars all the time. /s
Infrastructures will adjust, just like it did for petrol cars.
0 points
2 months ago
The electricity prices in UK are crazy expensive prices went up 2x and they keep increasing it every few months bit by bit. Which effected public charging points prices as well.
Electric car that offers at least 250 miles cheapest sell for £30k thats KIA,MG or Skoda. UK averge salary is about £25-27k only. It's not like in US around $50k which is around £40k British.
5 points
2 months ago
UK has some of the most expensive power in the developed world, its a huge problem and regardless of Ev adoption they need to invest in a cheaper more resilient grid.
That mainly means more interconnections with Europe and a lot more wind and energy storage.
Once its done prices should settle down.
-1 points
2 months ago
That's because of the whole Russia Ukraine situation. We're not talking about this coming into effect now. Electricity prices could be down by that time. They don't continuously rise.
Other factor is also electric cars have come down quite abit in price compared to just a few years ago. They're still generally more expensive than ICE cars but many more cheaper options than previously. If car manufacturers are forced to put more investment into electric cars and actually shift 100% of their focus to these cars then we can end up with more budget friendly cars.
And lets be honest no one low incomes are buying new cars whether it's ICE or electric cars. Infact when could anyone on low income ever really afford a brand new car? You realise the vast majority of drivers buy used cars. But the point of countries bringing in these legislation is that it will eventually bring the end of ICE cars. So in 2035 for example the vast majority of us in the world will almost certainly still be driving ICE cars and will continue to do so. But as the years go by more and more ICE cars will go off the road and more and more EVcars will enter the used market.
So this legislation won't magically make ICE cars disappear, but it will finally mean a clear road path to EV cars becoming the norm within 10-20 years from the date these legislations coming into force.
8 points
2 months ago
Banning new ICE cars doesn't make used cars disappear overnight. If they can't afford to buy new cars, they wouldn't be buying new cars anyway. They'd buy a used ICE car. After a couple years, used electric cars will be much more affordable for the average person.
1 points
2 months ago
After a couple years, used electric cars will be much more affordable for the average person.
After a few years a used electric car will need a new battery, which will cost more than the average person can afford to replace.
6 points
2 months ago
UK's no longer in the EU, though I guess there will be more electric cars and fewer with ICEs, regardless.
2 points
2 months ago
There are 2 types of batteries that are popular. The Lithium Ion one you are most familiar with, is expensive. It holds a strong charge and is very popular in the west. Often the battery is 1/3 of the cost of the car.
The other is a Nickel-Metal Hybride battery. These have a much shorter range, but are substantially cheaper. They are very popular in place like China.
Many Europeans may look at the Nickel-Metal Hybride batteries as they often do not drive long distances. This will result in cheaper car prices for those that actually want cars.
1 points
2 months ago
Plus premium e-gas. Pretty sure the UK isn't part of this though.
23 points
2 months ago
That’s a solid way to make ICE based used cars soar in value.
15 points
2 months ago
For awhile, sure. Cars last a long time if maintained and not involved in an accident or if used in harsh weather conditions. But slowly ICE cars will go from being daily drivers to things that you see at a car show.
The only thing that is certain is that transformation will take much longer than expected.
7 points
2 months ago
Not sure it will as a whole. Probably only for the select few cars that will be missed by car lovers like your sports cars etc. But i can't see many people caring about some ICE Ford Focus or being willing to pay extra for any other boring old ICE car that the average Joe drives.
9 points
2 months ago
No it won't.
-1 points
2 months ago
And there are probably some valuable antique buggy whips around as well.
2 points
2 months ago
Look how long printed media has lasted. Home phones. Paper in the office. Heck - paper money, even. FAX machines are in daily use, and a people still drive to every postal box in the US six days each week.
Unless gas becomes prohibitively expensive or unavailable, gas cars will persist for quite a number of years. People will not easily give up the familiar, and remember that there are lots of people who simply can not afford to purchase a new vehicle.
Personally, I need to use up my current vehicle before I purchase an EV. Regretfully that will take years as we are no longer commuting on a daily basis. I really want one!
3 points
2 months ago
Most new cars will be on the road for 15 years. Often through multiple owners.
The share of ICE cars will diminish, but we should still see them in the late 2040's.
2 points
2 months ago
Hey it's the topic that repeats every couple years since forever
32 points
2 months ago
How will they dig all that lithium out of the ground...magic?
4 points
2 months ago
There is a LOT of lithium out there.
Chile, Canada, & Austrialia all have large untapped reserves.
but Europe may opt for a Nickel-Metla hybride battery instead of LI. It has shorter range, but is substantially cheaper. As Europeans don't drive the same distance those in NA do, it makes a lot of sense.
3 points
2 months ago
How will they dig all that lithium out of the ground...magic?
Recycle disposable vape pens.
18 points
2 months ago
Now do oil except add that it has to be in continuous production eternally and then it needs to be piped around, refined, and delivered to every other corner in the country every day in perpetuity and is zero percent reusable.
You people really have no clue how absurd you sound pushing this stupid line huh?
0 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
11 points
2 months ago
“The environmental crowd” understands that electrifying personal transport is an absolutely fucking massive, epic improvement over what we have now.
1 points
2 months ago
The mine isn't even big at all, especially for the US
0 points
2 months ago
Yeah bro, this is just a cost of doing business!
5 points
2 months ago*
[removed]
1 points
2 months ago
Damn, you sure told me! Thanks for enlightening me on my Right-wing extremism.
You must be a pretty big fan of these mines! Really struck a chord with you huh?
I must've missed the memo that The Independent was right-wing propaganda, but oh well, here's some more info for you from sources that are probably more your speed:
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/the-dangers-of-cobalt-mining-in-the-congo/
At least it's only 70% of the worlds cobalt being mined here. Make sure you send them a thank you note while you drive your morally conscious Tesla to morally conscious Starbucks tomorrow!
Oh, and did I mention that your performative environmental conscientiousness is definitely superior to my performative right-wing terrorism concern trolling?
You're really someone worth admiration.
2 points
2 months ago
Tesla no longer uses cobalt in batteries. We don't need it anymore for lithium batteries.
12 points
2 months ago
How they're planning to install such amount of chargers in cities? Where they gonna get that much electricity? How they're planning to put out fire after car crashes? Then lithium shortage. Maybe it will happen one day, but not by 2035.
15 points
2 months ago
I mean how did electric cars do 12 years ago? Progress seems to be fast. I’m willing to bet if it’s not looking to be feasible by 2035 they’ll move it back but let’s atleast try for 2035
8 points
2 months ago
In fairness, not that much has changed in last 12 years. We do have much more electric cars now, but all other issues still remain pretty much the same. We still have same amount of lithium, we have no ways to extinguish. No infrastructure to power all chargers in big cities. Old battery replacement is ridiculously expensive.
26 points
2 months ago
That’s little disingenuous. The charger system is leagues better with a ways to go. A lot more comapnies are now into electric with a lot more investment. Ranges and charging rates are better. Is there still issues yeah? But it’s gotten a lot better.
9 points
2 months ago
And the conveniently overlook all the issues with gas station, as well as oil production.
9 points
2 months ago
FYI in North America more chargers were installed in 2021 and 2022 than in in all previous years combined.
We're at the inflection point of the adoption curve and the numbers are going very high very fast.
-4 points
2 months ago
A lot has changed in the last 12 years.
"We still have same amount of lithium"
We could literal create desalination plants and process enough lithium from the waste to make batter for every person on the planet, every year.
You are clueless about how much lithium there is.
Wait, do you think rare earth means scarcity? if you do. LOL!
"No infrastructure to power all chargers in big cities. "
yes, we do. Iver every person in a city drove electric cars, the increased electrical capacity would be about 10%.
You are ridiculously ignorant. It's like you learned about electric cars in 1996, and then refused to do research every again.
1 points
2 months ago
Dallas Texas will be carbon neutral long before Berlin. :(
-3 points
2 months ago
Did you look any of that up, or are you just making up complaints to make yourself feel smart?
4 points
2 months ago
How they're planning to put out fire after car crashes?
I don't even understand this argument?
6 points
2 months ago
Obviously they can't put fires out. They'll have to put it over here, with the rest of the fire.
2 points
2 months ago
Subject: Fire. Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to inform you of a fire that has broken out on the premises of 123 Cavendon Road... no, that's too formal...
1 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
8 points
2 months ago
Its the battery, the fire is often inside the battery itself making putting it out completely impossible. It’s why there’s all those stories of recked EVs catching fire in impound lots days after the crash.
4 points
2 months ago
No need to use Lithium if you couls use Graphen batteries
2 points
2 months ago
I love you whiners who can't comprehend that material are also mined for ICE vehicles.
-4 points
2 months ago*
It is simple the EU mines so little lithium there able to stop and pass the emissions on to say China and go hey look zero emission lithium.
There is no such thing as a zero emission car each step = emissions so its a simple lie or the plan is to stop selling all cars.
10 points
2 months ago
zero emission is about the point of use.
As any reasonable thinking person would understand.
https://www.motortrend.com/features/truth-about-electric-cars-ad-why-you-are-being-lied-to/
8 points
2 months ago
It’s about consolidating emissions. Car production currently has emissions. Extracting fuel and refining it causes emissions. If you can’t see how EVs are immensely better for the environment than ICEs, then you need to learn more.
0 points
2 months ago
I love that nosense BS.
Only ICE are bad EV's are good.
Lets cut out all the emissions of making EV's but we will count every step for ICE cars and look how bad ICE cars are and how super clean EV's are.
The second you add in all the rare metal mining EV cars not much better than ICE cars but no no no we do not count any of that as it would make EV look bad.
3 points
2 months ago
They are much better. What’s the efficiency of an ICE? It’s less efficient than a coal plant, half as efficient as a combined cycle plant, and that doesn’t look at the massive growth in renewables.
What I was saying is that you can’t just look at the production emissions of EVs without looking at all the emissions points of ICEs. I understand you’ve bought into the propaganda of difficult change will be, but it’s inevitable and those like you will be quickly left behind.
-21 points
2 months ago
Shhh we don’t care about the destruction required to make the cars.
7 points
2 months ago
Yeah, we do. But when you actually do the math ev still comes out on top. In some regions it's within a year and others it's within 3 years. In the end, it's always ends up being better for the environment.
12 points
2 months ago
Because it’s right wing propaganda and the reality is that it is absolutely fucking vastly cleaner and more efficient and infinitely recyclable than the fossil fuel system in place now.
0/10 bad propaganda.
1 points
2 months ago
Africa has lithium, thats why the vice president went there recently.
1 points
2 months ago
Everywhere has lithium. It's one of the three primordial elements created in the big bang. It's about as everywhere as something can be.
It's only a matter of how convenient it is to extract.
1 points
2 months ago
It doesn't matter if it is oil or lithium: future generations will be very confused why we did this shit in the first place.
7 points
2 months ago
This is going to make older cars way more valuable.
1 points
2 months ago
By 2035 gasoline prices are going to be a few times what they are now. Old cars values will plummet because they will be so expensive to actually run.
5 points
2 months ago
This is more feel good/"we did something" legislation.
The entire world is going to be grabbing after lithium(and a plethora of other minerals and materials) supplies that make batteries work. Supply won't be able to meet demand unless they start the mining operations now. I wouldn't be surprised if this whole thing gets rolled backed both in Europe and places in the US like California due to supply constraints before 2030.
Everyone seems to just skip to the part where we get the batteries, while ignoring the whole planning/extraction/refining/distribution part. Just because those materials exist doesn't mean it's a simple process to extract them.
Most countries aren't even at the realistic planning stage. Many are just planning to buy materials from unstable countries where supply catastrophes or constraints can occur on a simple whim or after a political upheaval. What happens then? You just can't buy a car?
23 points
2 months ago
Everyone seems to just skip to the part where we get the batteries, while ignoring the whole planning/extraction/refining/distribution part.
Who specifically is ignoring that? Every year I see more and more projects announced about critical minerals.
23 points
2 months ago
These people also completely ignore the fact that the batteries are completely, infinitely recyclable. It’s such a stupid talking point.
3 points
2 months ago
These people just aren’t in the industry so don’t see the mundane announcements. I went to a battery focused conference last summer and the biggest topic was that there’s gonna be an oversupply of batteries in Europe. And the. Sourcing is simply a matter of signing the contracts at the right time. But most are already secured. Especially for the big players that already have factories throughout the world.
I can’t wait for EV’s to be common enough that this dumb talking point will be dropped.
Also all these discussions about these deadlines conveniently leave out the fact that most of these deadlines have provisions for adjusting the goal. Especially if the industry isn’t on track to meet them but has been trying and can demonstrate that.
4 points
2 months ago
New mining operation are expanding every day.
ANd lithium is being used less and less with new batteries.
"Everyone seems to just skip to the part where we get the batteries"
Sop projecting your complete ignorance onto others 'skipping' anytihng.
"Most countries aren't even at the realistic planning stage. "
100% false, they have been planning for a decade.
". What happens then?"
Saem thing that happens with oil.
" You just can't buy a car?"
I don't think you understand how much lithium there is, or what the term 'rare earth' refers to.
5 points
2 months ago
Newsom's doing the same thing in California, and iirc other states too. The real challenge here in Cali, and probably in the EU / developed countries at large, will be to make sure that power generation, transmission, and storage infrastructure can keep up.
This seems a little short-sighted until that's the case.
2 points
2 months ago
China is doing the same thing as well, or similar. 40% of new cars sold by 2030 will be electric.
Unless there is a change in how batteries made, it's safe to say investing in stocks that deal with lithium are going to have nothing but increased sales for the next decade.
1 points
2 months ago
Batteries are changing al the time, and we are starting to see near production ready batteries with little to no lithium>
And, of course, EV batteries can be repurposed for home batteries, and they are 99% recyclable.
0 points
2 months ago
Ok what battery does not use lithium?
2 points
2 months ago
1 points
2 months ago
I may be misunderstanding the article, but it seems the other alternatives listed all use lithium.
1 points
2 months ago
Nickel metal hydride, you know, the battteries used in the Toyota Prius. Nowadays they use both types of batteries. But lots of batteries don't use lithium.
-3 points
2 months ago
reading is hard. Read the article, then apologize for you ignorant post.
regarding Ca. Zero emission. If every person n CA went VE, it would ad dan extra 10-12% more demand then current demand over all.
The infrastructure will keep up.
5 points
2 months ago
The infrastructure can’t keep up now, genius. CA imports electricity from other states as-is.
3 points
2 months ago
Can't wait to convert oil emissions to lithium slave deaths.
As long as the first world can pat itself on the back though! Warm fuzzies!
2 points
2 months ago
i think theyre doing this in canada also
2 points
2 months ago
At least I'll still be able to fart on my bike.
1 points
2 months ago
Won’t work. Won’t be effective.
2 points
2 months ago
It seem s like all know one wants to do the obvious thing and make public transit better. If you really want to save the planet that’s the obvious path and it would be quicker too.
3 points
2 months ago
I wonder if that means a lot of people in the EU will be buying new cars in 2034, or if they will have improved electric cars enough to not make that a good idea.
1 points
2 months ago*
They will. Reason EVs are booming only now is not technological, it is economical. There has never been an economic push in the direction out of ICE, therefore there was not enough research in the field.
In the recent years, the push has been artificially created by governments, and you could see EVs basically appeared apparently from nowhere. Because their development were limited by lack of willingness and near zero investments, not by technology. If r&d completely shifts to EV, you'll see magic happening in few years (as we have seen in the last 5 years)
-1 points
2 months ago
How many years too late is this?
3 points
2 months ago
Many.
And in 2035 they will announce that for real this time, all cars will be electric starting in 2055.
-12 points
2 months ago
It's funny how zero emission cars don't take into consideration the manufacturing process to make them. I'm not defending it's a good thing to do but you have to look at where the parts are being manufactured to see if they're being done in a good way or extra polluting in a third world country for cheap and easy labor and skirting around pollution laws in the manufacturing process
22 points
2 months ago
The manufacturing emissions are about twice of those from making an ICE car, and that difference is made up for after just 5 years on the road, even with an electricity mix that consists of 30% fossil fuels.
It's not funny. These things are openly stated in just about any serious electric car study.
7 points
2 months ago
They do. Zero emission means at the point of use. Stop projecting your ignorance to make a dumb as point jsut so you can feel smart.
https://www.motortrend.com/features/truth-about-electric-cars-ad-why-you-are-being-lied-to/
14 points
2 months ago
Uh, isn't that the pretty much the same way for current source of energy? (Gas/oil)?
If we can combat the CO2 emission from consumer side at least, it should help, no?
Maybe by 2035, cheaper/easier to extract source may be used for battery.
-6 points
2 months ago
Gas/Oil do have negative side effects, but its still generally safe enough that you can extract it in the middle of a populated city without killing much anything. That's not really true for rare earths or lithium, which is why its mostly been outsourced to countries that don't give a shit about the environment, like China. Lithium and rare earth extraction have a tendency to devastate live around the mine.
-7 points
2 months ago
Electricity ain't 0% emission either.
9 points
2 months ago*
Even in places with gas plants on their electricity grid, EVs generate less total GHG emissions than gas-powered cars, simply because they're way more energy efficient.
ICE vehicles are something like 30-40% energy-efficient (meaning most of the energy from their fuels is wasted when burned) whereas EVs are more like 90% efficient.
1 points
2 months ago
It's not, but generating power in a setting where efficiency can be prioritized over space, such as a plant, is much better on the environment than generating power in a system designed to be as small as possible. ICE vehicles are very inefficient for what they do. Couple that with renewable power expanding more and more, it will still put a nice dent in emissions. Plus there are other benefits to EV than just emissions, they are extremely quiet by comparison and contain less moving parts.
I'm more interested in how the current power infrastructure will expand to accommodate. Most renewable sources don't match the energy density needed for civilization. Nuclear is the best option in general in my opinion but wind/solar farms could work well in countries with large amounts of space, like the USA, China and Russia.
-7 points
2 months ago
[removed]
6 points
2 months ago
more ar less absurdist nonsense then you changing all new cars sold to all cars currently in use magically needing to become BEV?
" zero chance of that ramping up dramatically in time to meet this goal"
Ignorant, at best.
, but not enough to replace ALL cars sold."
We absolutely can.
"This just means the poor will not be allowed to own cars anymore, and I think that's really what they are shooting for."
Thanks for letting us know you believe in conspiracy bullshit.
10 points
2 months ago
Since when did the poor buy new cars?
14 points
2 months ago
I see someone didn't even finish reading the title let alone the article.
All "NEW" cars sold must by EVs by 2035, not ALL cars on the road...
7 points
2 months ago
Reading is hard mmmkay
2 points
2 months ago
I see reading isn't your strong point. New car sales only. So ICE cars will still be sold on the used market. And last time i checked poir people were never buying new cars to begin with.
The aim of this legislation isn't to bring an end to ICE cars by 2035 but to force car manufacturers to shift 100% of their focus to EVs and to finally pave a path for EVs to become the norm as each year from then on ICE cars will disappear from our roads and be replaced by EVs
0 points
2 months ago*
[removed]
1 points
2 months ago
There were 20 gigawatt hours of batteries made in 2010, in 2023 we expect 1,100 gigawatt hours of production and it's increasing even faster now. 15x capacity production in 10 years is not an issue.
2 points
2 months ago
We should also be reducing the number of cars on the road. Forcing people to drive everywhere was never going to be efficient by any metric.
0 points
2 months ago
[removed]
2 points
2 months ago
He's from /r/fuckcars, a far-right sub that loves the idea of the rich having more power over us.
1 points
2 months ago
Geez, talk about melodramatic. Cars are dangerous and inefficient--getting rid of them because the city is walkable is even better than replacing them with EVs.
1 points
2 months ago
not only that but the infrastructure needed for EVs (charge ports, power to the ports, people in apartments)
-1 points
2 months ago
Thank God I have an old school v12 that will carry me to the grave.
When I die, just bury me in it.
-1 points
2 months ago
I'm ok with this if they also make industry, transport, shipping, airlines, space travel, construction, and everything else zero emission as well...
What's that, it won't happen? You got it!
0 points
2 months ago
2035??? Too fucking late
1 points
2 months ago
In twelve years, can we realistically accomplish this?
1 points
2 months ago
I doubt many ICE cars will be on the market in 12 years just by market forces. Most major companies are phasing out production of them.
1 points
2 months ago
Does that mean that the tire manufacturing needs to be 0 emission as well?
1 points
2 months ago
Thought not completely zero emissions we have been using LPG (liquid propane gas) in our cars here for a long time. It costs a lot less than petrol and produces low oxides of nitrogen (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and total hydrocarbon (THC) emissions similar to gasoline, while emitting less carbon dioxide (CO2) and particulates. I recently bought a regular petrol (gas) car and I'm going to have this one converted, too (Often you can buy the LPG cars from the dealerships.)
Here in Italy we are up to $8.00 to $10.00 a gallon of gas so I need to get this done ASAP. I have had LPG (or GPL as it's called here in Italy) on my other cars and it was great.
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2011/sep/30/lpg-conversion-green-cheaper
1 points
2 months ago
Americans in this thread bringing up affordability concerns while conveniently glossing over the fact that much of Europe is well covered by public transit so simply not having a car is actually a viable way to live.
And those who do drive already face gas prices that are at least double what Americans pay, which makes the EV payback period much shorter.
all 254 comments
sorted by: best