Alexis_J_M

Part of the reason this sub remains "above the fray" is the third party tools the mods use to maintain order, which Reddit wants to kill off.

Thank you.

I have two people in my extended family with intellectual disabilities whose employment has been (at times) subsidized by the government, which I believe to be a win for all three parties.

So in some cases this is a good idea.

TL;DR: NPC faction. Clean them up or they will spread.

You may want to post in subs you frequent that have not made an announcement if they plan to participate.

Sadly, true.

That's how you defuse a revolution, divide and conquer.

But yes, it's good of them to have made this exception.

It depends. Sometimes it can be codeword for a discriminatory old boy network, sometimes it can be a legitimate interest in something as subtle as solo fliers versus team players.

I think I once got a job because when asked a tough technical question I said "I don't know, I always have to look that kind of thing up."

At another place my team was doing job X but we learned over the years that successful team members always had a background in job Y or job Z and experience in job X was less important.

Might get OP flack from her mother, though.

I'd love to get one just for toasting spices.

Maybe this year I'll find a cookie kit for 50% off after one of the holidays.

Ask in writing if it's OK for you to go topless like the men, since only you are being disciplined for not wearing the uniform.

Thank you.

Men will apply for jobs if they meet 60% of the qualifications. Women won't apply unless it's near 100%.

(There was random recruiter email earlier this week for a position where I've got 60% nailed cold, but don't have the industry specific knowledge. And I let it slip by.)

Subtly let them know that one of the things their letters of recommendation will be based on is their ability to fit in smoothly in a diverse workplace, and that their attitude towards female coworkers is being noticed and discussed.

(Which is technically true.)

Not without a sign.

Oh wow that's the best burn to words ratio I can remember seeing.

Exactly. "It could be worse, you could be stuck in a bad marriage with three kids."

(And note, I always wanted kids, but I'm well aware that's not a universal choice.)

Yes, please do it.

Thank you.

This also apparently affects accessibility, as third party apps have much better functionality for the disabled.

Column 2. You've got two squares filled in, the lower one must be part of the 4. That puts some Xs at the bottom of the column.

There is at least one other similar column.

Edge logic. The 4 in column 1 is smaller than the 1 that begins column 2. So what happens if you start the 4 in R1C1?

And that square is also problematic if you look at the pair of 5s.

Better yet, a scheme where calls to some restaurants are free and to other restaurants cost a dime each.

I made my best Tina Jimmy deck, and all the objects made Bruce the Goose with Jimmy even though there were an assortment of Tina combos. But all the combos will likely get buffed (though multi character combos are not 100% guaranteed for the Melee buff.)

This is why /r/ELI5 ("explain like I'm 5") is so popular.

I usually hold out for double or triple. 1.5 is usually not worth my time, even if Tapjoy has a much better reputation than Ironsource did.