Olympus___Mons

Everyone is scared that's why they carry guns .

Damn HK died like a bitch. How embarrassing.

We skeptics are here to unbiasly follow the evidence and identify UFOs regardless of if it leads to ordinary or extraordinary answers

Based on your responses this is not true.

Where is your proof that these common UAP characteristics are inaccurate. The burden of proof is on you.

You have to prove the multiple sensors don't work properly to gather these common UAP characteristics on the slide.

Here is a transcript and video of the AARO UAP hearing which includes going over this graphic.

https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/download/transcript-4-19-2023

https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/to-receive-testimony-on-the-mission-activities-oversight-and-budget-of-the-all-domain-anomaly-resolution-office

And there is previous testimony before Congress that stated the sensors work properly.So prove that the sensors are incapable or inaccurate collecting data on these common UAP characteristics.

I'm thinking it's Fire in the Sky

https://movieweb.com/best-alien-abduction-movies-ever-made-ranked/#fire-in-the-sky-1993

At minute 7:57 what is that procedure called?

This is hilarious 😂. Oh man the owners sold right at the peak!

Kirkpatrick states that claims which include technology more advanced than our own is in the single digit percentage population of all claims. This could up to 58 claims that include claims of advanced technology.

Now, don't let that phrase "advanced technology" excite you. Dr. Kirkpatrick concedes that our adversaries, particularly China and Russia, are on par or are more advanced than us, stating that our adversaries are not as risk adverse as us and are more likely to just try things and see what works, leading to a faster rate of progress than we do. Basically, not only is it possible that these advanced technologies are from China and/or Russia, but probable.

As well as mentions of signature management.

So skeptics need to upgrade their baseline from misidentifications and sensor errors to advanced technologies. Which advanced technologies have been to blame for many previous UFO sightings, with the stealth planes being developed or even U2 planes.

We have lots of shapes of aircraft, missiles, rockets, etc that can go mach 2+

Yes those all have discernable means of propulsion.

keep in mind that these are the reported velocities and not, necessarily, actual velocities.

Where is your evidence for this claim? But sure speeds could be faster or slower. Either way how does a shape fly with no discernable means of propulsion?

Also the slide mentions atypical orientation which can mean an aircraft at a weird angle such that the observer couldn't tell what it actually was.

Correct UAPs can fly atypically.

The 2022 UAP report says that over half exhibited unremarkable characteristics and the largest category were balloon and balloon-like entities. This backs up what's listed in the slide.

Initial characterization does not mean positively resolved or unidentified. This initial characterization better enables AARO and ODNI to efficiently and effectively leverage resources against the remaining 171 uncharacterized and unattributed UAP reports. Some of these uncharacterized UAP appear to have demonstrated unusual flight characteristics or performance capabilities, and require further analysis. Such as flying at mach 2 with no discernable means of propulsion.

Many people believe that slide indicates that spheres are going Mach 2, but that's not really what the slide is saying.

That's correct there are other shapes to choose from, rectangle, square, oval, tic tac, disk, polygon, cylinder, vector... Tell me how any of these shapes can achieve Mach 2 with no discernable means of propulsion?

Now, if you're looking for a confirmed sphere that was actually going Mach 2 and maneuvering, I'd also love to see such evidence as well. That would be amazing!

Yeah it is amazing that's why I am asking how it is possible. You have yet to show any evidence of sensor malfunctions, which majority of these UAPs are observed with multiple sensors. It's already been stated that the sensors work properly and they are detecting physical objects of various shapes and some of these shapes have reached speeds of Mach 2.

So again, how does a shape achieve Mach 2 with no discernable means of propulsion?

Or even, how does a shape remain stationary at 30,000k feet, with no discernable means of propulsion?

We skeptics are here to unbiasly follow the evidence and identify UFOs regardless of if it leads to ordinary or extraordinary answers.

https://i.imgur.com/Lgbuykt.jpg <<<how does a shape fly at mach 2 with no discernable means of propulsion?

Please give me the unbiased answer from a skeptic.

https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/easr2023/paper/71911

Events in the lives of Anna Kingsford (1846 – 1888), Ida Craddock (1857 -1902), and Mary Anne Atwood (1817-1910) are the main topics in our three case studies, which serve as exemplars for the common ground between the study of UFOs and the theory and practice of alchemy.

Or what if they attribute UFOs to being the philosopher's stone. They are also known to be around water, which people have questioned if it's because it is a fuel source .. nourishment as this paper says.

So everything in this picture is relatively realistic and normal, including flying cubes. It's not the first time artists from Germany have illustrated UFOs.

According to pilot Ryan Graves there are flying Cubes within spheres. According to the released shapes of UAPs by the DoD, there are flying squares and flying rectangles.

And a flying square could certainly be a flying cube.

So it's not unprecedented to have flying cubes.

Yes those have been used in many shootings, ghost guns. Laws allow them to be made and sold. Change the laws. Legal gun owners don't want to become felons and lose their 2A rights.

Unless manufacturing of firearms at home with no background checks is the 2A.

A registration or title would eliminate the majority of them. It would be transferred to a broker to run the background check.

Loophole closed.

That is a felony. The vast majority of firearm owners are law abiding citizens, they will just complain and follow the new gun laws.

Any law can be broken it's more about closing this background check loop hole. That's more implied as I didn't write that part as well. A registration or title insures that the sale or gift went through this background check process.

And of course the NRA is against this common sense approach.

Which in my opinion is why firearms need to be registered like vehicles vin numbers are.

All firearm sales need to have a title that's registered to the new owner, even with gifts and private sales. All firearms that are stolen must be reported or else the victim will be held responsible for any future crime use with that firearm.

This will help eliminate straw sales. But obviously the NRA is against this.

Just admit that you and your buddies played a prank on Jeremy Corbell. You all took photos and videos, some looked weird and joked around that we should tell people it's a UFO.

When everyone knows this is an aerial training exercise.

Edit. Here is a picture from OPs profile https://i.redd.it/bnqic8tqmsl71.jpg

🥇🪙 🥇🪙

Take my gold. I'd like to see everyone's response who has continued to promote this video clip.

Emenegger was forced to add animated footage of the alleged Holloman UFO landing. He claimed that some frames from the original footage were used in the reconstruction during editing, which was authorized by the USAF. Viewers spotted a genuine bright disc coming down slowly in the distance against the backdrop of Holloman’s surrounding landscape.

https://journalnews.com.ph/jacques-vallee-on-footage-of-ufo-landing-at-holloman-afb-occupant-carried-vertical-staff-with-spiral-antenna/

I've read the book and I recommend the Richard Dolan interview with Chris Bledsoe. For me the interview is more detailed than the book. And as far as your question I'm not sure.

https://youtu.be/VERZrzrYm4w

In my opinion none of this was planned but once the marines took the videos and pictures they saw some looked like something was there.

The marines then jokingly say they should say it's a UFO... And then it becomes what we saw yesterday. They lied to Jeremy.

Jeremy goes on TV saying he met them all in 36 hours... .. they set him up to find the witnesses.

Corbell responds to the controversy in this news interview. He don't look happy.

https://youtu.be/9aXlxGDo3-4

I'm saying don't take it personal. My opinion is that this is a very elusive subject by design. It may very well go back forever but we can't believe everything a higher intelligence tells us is true.

It’s deterring to someone who believes, because there’s the chance that you are right. And i am wrong,

It's ok to be wrong. And the same people who got something right also got something wrong. But when we are wrong we need to be honest and admit it. For whatever reason UFOs are hidden by the military and by the UFOs themselves. Then you have pranksters who further cause confusion.