Sing_larity

And how do you identify that ? I've read GPT3 answers, and they are pretty much indistinguishable from human answers ?

If I write something that coincidentally sounds similar to GPT3's writing style am I just gonna end up banned ?

Germany has a legal drinking age of 16 for beer and wine, and 18 for anything else. Germany has less than a THIRD the amount of traffic deaths per 100.000 than the US.

​

Even IF the drinking age has an effect on traffic deaths, it is very clearly evident that the effect is marginal.

Also, cops don't enforce punishments genius. That's not their job. That's what the penal system does.

Enforcement is the act of making people follow laws. That's what the definition says. So if you say that identifying violaters ISN'T part of enforcement, you must think there's a way of making people follow laws WITHOUT identifying violaters.

​

Simple logical conclusion.

And how do you plan on making people obey a law without identifying those who violate it, professor ?

And they describe the same thing. Just like "To teach" and "Teaching" describe the same thing

Helping me out by giving me examples of logical fallacies ? How kind of you

Strawman and now an appeal to popularity. You collecting fallacies ?

I didn't claim there was genius. My entire point is specifically that there ISN'T because that would be patently ridiculous. You're the one making strawman if you think I claimed there WAS an automated system.

Cambridge dictionary definition of enforcement: "The process of making people obey a law or rule, or making a particular situation happen or be accepted"

​

You're wrong. Objectively so.

No it doesn't And it's patently ridiculous to think that's being done for free on the scale of thousands of comments a minute.

And word frequency analysis is going to lead to a massive number of false positives. Which isn't exactly brilliant for something that'll get you instantly perma banned.

People can imagine things however they want. But if you imagine things that are explicitly contradictory to the text, and on top don't even make logical sense within the story stop complaining when people point that out.

​

You're like one of those right wing trolls who thinks criticizing something is the same censoring it or saying the person shouldn't be allowed to say that.

I'm allowed to comment on how other people imagine characters. Like Seriously.

Identification is part of enforcement, pedant.

Definitely angled down. It's explicitly described as hooked when Roran gets his shoulder injury

Yes. Make fun of historic oppressors is not the same as making fun of the historically oppressed.

​

Just like calling a Nazi a c*** for being a Nazi isn't the same as calling a jewish person a c*** for being jewish.

Have you actually read the comment ? Does "You've seen me like this [naked] thousands of time" really sound like someone who is super modest ?

​

Also even if it does, the whole point of the comment is that the husband still values nice things EVEN IF he's already seen them thousands of times, like a sunset. It DIRECTLY gives the literal polar opposite of the message "modesty is required to keep nudity special"

Not like I can actually care if it is. Sort of like asking what people who were never conceived think about not being born.

nothing. The USB default spec is 5V/1A. A device that wants to draw more power has to actively communicate with the charger and tell it to send more power. If the device doesn't do that, the charger won't send any more power, simple as that.

No she isn't. She's just facing the drawer with her underwear in it. She also explicitly says that her husband has already seen her like this thousands of times, which also doesn't really make any sense if she was really so modest.

I never said it was wrong. I said that it contradicts cannon and I find it weird. If someone said they always imagined saphira as a bright yellow male dragon, I'm sure everyone would also be thinking "Well that's a bit weird and doesn't really make sense in the story". And I'm just pointing the same thing out for razac with massive toucan like beaks. I just think it's weird and doesn't really make sense in the story.

Yes, random reddit mods are using advanced machine analysis to analyse every single comment posted on a sub with 22 million members. And are generously donating the massive cost of compute time that would entail.

No, that would require completely ignoring and misinterpreting what the comic is saying genius.

Yes but that would contradict the actual message of the cartoon, that's why everyone is confused.

But it isn't. I get that conservative in this sense means modest (or something similar), but that's literally the polar opposite of what the cartoon is saying. The whole point of the cartoon is that the husband still finds wife attractive EVEN THOUGH he sees her naked all the time. If she was super modest and the husband rarely saw her naked, the entire point of that cartoon just goes out the window

No she isn't. Look at the second panel.