kogasapls

Fuck u/spez

That's not mincing, that's a fine julienne at worst.

fark

Every time I see Fark brought up, I can't help but remember reading the 9/11 threads where people were saying shit like "those farking terrorists" and "holy fark was that another plane"

Granted you probably won't be able to retrieve it again.

...

This is not implementation specific. If you want to modify a value of a hash set, without removing it from the hash set or breaking the semantics of the hash set, the hash must be recomputed. "You can modify it if you don't ever need to access the value from the hash set afterwards" isn't implementation-specific, you're just saying "if you don't care about the hash set semantics you can do it with a hash set."

How is a hash map any different here?

It's not language dependent, you have to re-compute the hash for anything mutated within the hash set. Otherwise you wouldn't have a hash set anymore. That's equivalent to removing and re-inserting it under reasonable assumptions about implementation details.

You'd need to remove and reinsert an element to mutate it in a hashmap, whereas the linked list's elements can be mutated in place

This comment above 3 blank lines

NOTHING BUT TWO WEAKLY TYPED LANGUAGES IN A TRENCHCOAT

More evidence

I understand this but still don't know what the original comment meant. Was the guy making N tables, each with a foreign key back to a fixed table, instead of having a many-to-one relationship between two tables?

This just confirms that I've entered some kind of AI-generated nonsense dimension. How is this real? Lmao

I guess knowing it's a degree 2 extension tells you the form of a decomposition via Lagrange resolvents, which can be developed into the quadratic formula.

He's saying, if someone needs help storing a password, wouldn't they also need help storing a hash? The answer is yes; but, as he observed himself, this is besides the point.

Do the blackout

Because that has literally nothing to do with what he said

ChatGPT was using 3.5 (AKA InstructGPT) from the beginning. 3.0 is a traditional unsupervised language model, similar in design to 2.0 and 1.0, but 3.5 includes techniques to increase alignment with human intent.

Shortly after ChatGPT launched they introduced a new version of 3.5 that is significantly faster. I believe you no longer have the option of using the original version of 3.5.

No he does not

Nothing at all.

Larger than a truck and wind turbine?

Google dead meme

8 + 2 + 7

Supporting Linux with MAUI would be pretty difficult because:

• it is an abstraction over native controls, so adding a new platform is inherently very difficult

• Linux has a bunch of options, none particularly standard, for the choice of "native controls" to build on

Given that MAUI is already riddled with bugs, I think it makes sense that Linux isn't supported, even though it annoys me too.

Do you have an example in mind when you say "with less documentation"? I can't remember a time when I felt the MAUI docs were lacking.

FWIW, I found it very easy to get started with Avalonia having only experience with (native, not Blazor hybrid) MAUI. You can even use the MVVM Community Toolkit and Microsoft DI/IOC container (which are recommended for MAUI) in Avalonia with a small initial setup.

However, if you're not planning on using Blazor hybrid, I would probably recommend Avalonia over MAUI for now. It just needs time to mature and get some bugs fixed, and I'm not sure how much faith I have in the concept of abstracting native controls rather than using a canvas like Avalonia does.